What is with the world

Why is it that there is girls at the age of 13 or 14 wanting to get pregnant dont they see that they cant afford having a baby right now they need there education first ? I mean like how would you support a baby when your still in school?
And why would...

you have unprotected sex if you knew what was going to happen ?even if the guy said he would pull out before he cummed it is still possible to get pregnant thats why they invented birth control and condoms so people could have sex and not worry about getting sexually transmitted diseases or getting pregnant so why do people still not bother with using brith control and condoms?

good question...well truth is I think that some people dont realise the after effect of doing something... KARMA is a strong force that has serous consequences to actions, so basically yah. but on the other side I can see why sometimes there is unprotective sex... like they get really into the mood and they just keep going but EVEN then you still get the mourning after pill because its idiotic if you dont.

Good question.

In the context of this question I am a father.

The law allows consentual sex at 14 years of age partly for the purpose of accomodating the longing of young women who want to be mothers. Full time mothers could be considered as being part of the traditional social fabric where social programs are conducive, or family provisional allowances satisfy necessity. Their postnatal highschool education options are available, usually with provision of their own family support for the child. It is not necessarily unplanned parenthood and young women can be very responsible and willing to busy themselves in the role of motherhood while giving enhanced value to quality of family life, such as for farming familes near your location. In the case of unexpected pregnancy with no option for abortion the child could be loved in regards to someone taking for granted the availability of socially responsible programs but if premature babies, or abnormal babies were involved the question of ideal care would seem to be a concern. Perhaps birth studies related to age of motherhood have been made available that could show no risk, it seems to me that anybody who would neglect their only chance at completing high school the normal way could be a regretful personal restriction to their workforce opportunities. Pro-choice and personal choice do not directly effect the general public except that taxpayers can end up paying the expenses so arguably the mother would procreate a new taxpayer or they would otherwise or later become a taxpayer, there is generally no social judgement involved by proper Canadians. Adoption at that age doesn't seem to make pregnancy a good option. I would condone only planned parenthood preferably through marriage to provide baptismal rights to the child, your question would seem to indicate someone's irresponsible behaviour.