Prove god is real

Ok pple say ders a god an evrythin an well I respect that but can you prove that without usin da whole feelin his spirty cr*p.so if anyone can plzz do tell!!

mandie your making the ersztg of us athists look baqd

its ookr yto slok down and type as if yoiur not textinfg because you think wre wrothy of the troiuhle iut takejms to type somethign that doenst seem likek ut was woritten by a chimp.

I don't believe that we came from monkeys...I only believe that God was there and created us...you shouldn't have to see proof that he is there...that's not how it works...I believe because I know there is a better place after death.

We must be the product of intelligent design, I mean just look at your spelling and grammar.

I dont believe theres a god... or there wouldnt be cancer... he would do somthing about it

LAWL at rick. Nice.

And to ladydon07: You do realize evolution is practically proven, right? Or does turning a blind eye go hand in hand with believing in God?

I do agree that God's existance shouldn't have to be proven, but some people NEED proof. And I also believe that belief in God can be combined with faith in science, unless you close yourself off to either one of them completely.

The only thing that really contradicts evolution is the Bible, which was written by humans like everyone on this site. If I wake up hearing voices tomorrow and write everything down, does that make what I hear real? No. But you can't prove everything either.

don't be bitter.. don't be so ignorant try reading the Bible.

yo dude straightup there is no answer the best answer your going to get is "faith"

If someone you loved asked you to "prove" that you loved them, what would you do? What if nothing you did was proof enough for them? Can you hold love in your hand and show it to them? No. So it is with God. There are many things he does to show us he is real, but many will not accept any type of proof. I can neither hold God nor love in my hand and show it to you, so does that mean you don't believe in either?

The bible was written by man, what good is it going to do reading the bible?
& besides, I've read it already, it's not so holy as people think it is.

I am a Christian and I have to say it wasn't the bible itself that made me believe in God. I didn't care what the bible had to say until after I believed in him. I was convinced by many other things, too much to get into here, but, reading the bible and choosing to believe it doesn't have to be the first step. First, search for truth and you may find it is consistent with the bible like I did. If you truly seek the truth and ask questions, It will lead you to God, or instead of truth you can just believe whatever fits with what you want. I personally didn't want to risk it. Thank God I didn't!

"If someone you loved asked you to 'prove' that you loved them, what would you do? What if nothing you did was proof enough for them? Can you hold love in your hand and show it to them? No. So it is with God."

Not analogous at all. It's not an issue of "proving" you love someone, it's "proving" they even exist. It doesn't seem unreasonable to want proof something exists if you're going to base your entire life on it, does it?

Who says evolution and science cannot go hand in hand with God?
You dont have to believe in one or the other (unless you insist on taking the word of some religious texts literally...)
There is no proof of God... No religion and no religious text can do that, you either believe or you dont... If you dont, so be it, why challenge people to prove something that cannot be proven?

You have to have 'faith' that god is real. I mean the bible is very complex and it does get pretty hard to follow, but thats where faith steps in. Why don't you try praying and asking God to help you and come into your life.

I wasn't talking about proving the person I was talking about proving the concept of love, which cannot be proven without doubt, so why believe in that either. It does make sense to want proof, but many things, like the concept of love, cannot be proven by science, yet most of us agree it exsists.

***which cannot be proven without doubt, so why believe in that either.***

Because people can experience that first hand. Its a psychological and/or emotional component of a tangible human being. Not a passive, intangible, hypothetical, super-dimensional entity, that apparently sees and controls the past, present, and future.

...see the diffrence now?

***Because people can experience that first hand. Its a psychological and/or emotional component of a tangible human being.***

Many, many people have experienced God first hand and that experience is a psychological and/or emotional componenet of a tangible human being. Same thing, I say I feel love, you believe me because you have felt it too. I say I have felt God, you don't believe me because you haven't felt it or haven't realized what it was when you did.

Love is passive, intangible, hypothetical and works on many differnt levels in many different ways. You can think you love someone one minute and then hate them the next. People confuse romantic love with infatuation all the time. Some people do not know the meaning of the word and love only themselves.

It comes down to... love is a concept that has many facets and inspite of all
the 'proof', it can't be proven. Gods existence has much 'proof', but can't be proven either. The only difference is everyone wants to feel love because it feels good, not everyone wants to believe in God because they are too prideful to admit they must answer to someone. Many people believe what they want out of convienence and weakness, not because they seek truth.

However, I will say you (captainassassin) seem to be intelligent on many levels and that is a respectable quality, use it for good!

There is no proof of this notion that god is real, I thought it was a belief?! All you'll get is invalid arguments, bible, and faith.

bluedrops, so you are saying god is psychological, like human emotions? I think you may be on to something.

***Many, many people have experienced God first hand and that experience is a psychological and/or emotional componenet of a tangible human being.***

That's debatable...

It adds a whole other dimension to the experience; since nobody considers GOD to be an emotion, nor LOVE to be a separate entity that created the universe. There's a big difference between feeling what you perceive to be God around you, with you, within you, etc. ...and actually hearing God talk to you, appearing before you, etc.

I guess you could think of it along the lines of 'close encounters' of the first, second, and third kind.

The reason the existence of God is so much more difficult to believe in, compared to love, is how these experiences are perceived by the individual. Any experience you have, that you would attribute to God, I could perceive differently. A Christian could say: "God told me to <blank>" or "God said I would find you." ...where as I would attribute any choices or decisions as a product of MY OWN reasoning, judgment, or concept of right & wrong.

Though I DO like your thought processes on the matter. It is more acceptable to me, an agnostic, for the struggle between right & wrong, good & evil, God & Satan, Heaven & Hell, to ALL be internalized within each individual. And those deities or entities, are actually figurative interpretations of the darkness and the light within all of us.

Now THAT I can believe...

Prove he is not ... Real.

My friend seen an Angel. I have a verse that stops your bleeding if you believe in God and in Jesus. It wouldn't work if they weren't real, so they are real cause it worked.

A verse that stops bleeding, huh? Really? Wow... and you don't have to do ANYTHING but say the verse, huh? That's all? You don't even have to put pressure on the wound, or dress it? Nothing?

*snickers*

...nut.