Which is worse: a life of fried food or a life of no food?

me. Asked by red_rose_mafia 10 months ago, 10 answers.

I know random isnt it but I was thinking about it and im curiuos wich is worse for you? a life of fried food or a life without food at all, give me opinions people!!! xxx

Question closed | Ask a Nutrition & Fitness question

Answered by sikashimmer on Jan 09, 2008, 10:52AM
| 3596 answers.
Advisor-small

A life without food is worse. Your body needs food to sustain itself... even if it's bad food at least it's SOMETHING.

(that's why on Man vs Wild he like eats nasty stuff. Because without nutrition you die)

xox
Sika

Answered by gatsos14 on Jan 09, 2008, 11:54AM
| 6 answers.

I am aneroix so I dont eat anyways

Answered by guru123 on Jan 09, 2008, 01:34PM
| 166 answers.

A life without food is worse.

Answered by guru123 on Jan 09, 2008, 01:34PM
| 166 answers.

A life without food is worse.

Answered by funadvice on Jan 09, 2008, 02:56PM
| 42395 answers.

A life without food is rather short? At least fried food would keep you going for longer, and experiencing much of the beauty that exists in this world.

Answered by bimjob on Jan 09, 2008, 03:48PM
| 1983 answers.

No food = DEATH within a few weeks (at most)
Fried food = Life, but probably shorter and with more health problems than if one ate more healthy.

Answered by rockingrl728 on Jan 09, 2008, 04:35PM
| 243 answers.

They're just as bad as each other.

To much fried food is extremely unhealthy, and so is no food. They can both KILL

Answered by zmarsh on Jan 09, 2008, 08:29PM
| 113 answers.

I would have to say fried food is worse. I haven't touched the stuff in over eight months.

Answered by funadvice on Jan 10, 2008, 02:38AM
| 42395 answers.

Slow death or quick death? That's your choice.

Answered by imme on Jun 01, 2008, 05:33AM
| 828 answers.

with food you live
without food you die
so with food is probably much much better.

Back to top

Popular questions related to Which is worse: A life of fried food or a life of no food?