I don't get this

Asked by tastetherainbow about 1 month ago, 23 answers.

If they was dust in the space in order to create a big bang then who put it there? A god or some type of higher being was there but how was there a higher being or a god just always there

Answered by cthulhu on Oct 02, 2008, 11:14PM
| 213 answers.

The Big Bang didn't originate from something in space. It was the origin of space and time. We really don't understand why or how there's something rather than nothing, and we may never be able to.

| 2 of 2 thought this was helpful

Answered by samyvengence on Oct 02, 2008, 11:00PM
| 159 answers.

it was the dust from the two planets between venus and mars that collided into each other...thats what put it there

Answered by pickles15 on Oct 02, 2008, 11:07PM
| 128 answers.

exactly.

Answered by arachnid on Oct 03, 2008, 12:44AM
| 1070 answers.

As cthulhu says - the big bang wasn't an explosion in space, because there was no space to have an explosion in. The big bang explains the early expansion of the universe itself.

Answered by sg51 on Oct 03, 2008, 02:15AM
| 16 answers.

The BIG BANG was most likely caused by some other universe colapsing. It was widely regarded as this univers was the only one up until the last few decades or so with the advent of modern tech. to see further into space than the naked eye or telescope.

Answered by arachnid on Oct 03, 2008, 02:35AM
| 1070 answers.

sg51: Er. I don't know where you get your info. Anything we can see with a telescope is by definition inside our universe. And anything that happened before the big bang is opaque to us.

Answered by jester_x on Oct 03, 2008, 03:28AM
| 660 answers.

Dont realy believe in the big bang or God.
However I do believe that all secintific theroy and fact will only get you so far till your at the point that the only answer is a creator in some form. I just think that being is spiritualy farther from us. sorta set up a self substaining enviroment and let it be

But thats just what I think

Answered by amblessed on Oct 03, 2008, 06:51AM
| 8670 answers.

Simple: The Bible addresses those issues - our choice whether to seek answers there with an open mind/heart, or not...Take care !!

Answered by toadaly on Oct 03, 2008, 09:18AM
| 2914 answers.

We have no evidence that the big bang was created in any sense of the word 'create'. The big bang is not something out there in space somewhere. The big bang *is* the universe.

Answered by captainassassin on Oct 03, 2008, 12:06PM
| 2496 answers.

***sg51: Er. I don't know where you get your info. Anything we can see with a telescope is by definition inside our universe. And anything that happened before the big bang is opaque to us.***

I think sg51 might be referencing 'multiverse theory'

Answered by thex13thxchild on Oct 03, 2008, 04:20PM
| 822 answers.

It wasn't really dust, it was a super atom(wow I feel like a preschool kid saying that, you'ld think scientist would come up with a better name) that had contained some of the elements & the substance to make the rest. There was some sort of reaction that caused a counter reaction causing it to explode(thus the big bang) spreading gases & such acros the universe. Though there are flaws to that logic.
There are other theories out there, like the universe wasn't created, it just has always been, or that 2 parallel universes collided & made this universe, the ripples in the universes created the clumps of matter in this one.
But hey, it all depends what you believe in, no matter what anyone else says it all comes down to what you feel is right.

Answered by arachnid on Oct 03, 2008, 04:39PM
| 1070 answers.

"<incoherent big-bang explanation omitted>

But hey, it all depends what you believe in, no matter what anyone else says it all comes down to what you feel is right."

No, it all comes down to what's actually correct. "What you feel is right" is irrelevant if you're wrong.

Answered by captainassassin on Oct 03, 2008, 05:30PM
| 2496 answers.

***No, it all comes down to what's actually correct.***

Well... how can ANY theory about the beginning of the universe be CORRECT, when no one can prove it?

Answered by yamiumi on Oct 03, 2008, 10:21PM
| 7 answers.

There was no "dust". There were only electrons, protons, neutrons.. pure energy which gathered up until it just exploded. From the heat and force of that explosion the 'trons fused and became the first elements.

Even the bible states that in the beginning there was nothing.

Answered by arachnid on Oct 04, 2008, 03:11AM
| 1070 answers.

captainassassin: Just because we can't prove it doesn't mean there isn't a correct theory - we just may never know what it is. My point was that saying "what you believe is all that matters" is a recipe for ignorance.

Answered by captainassassin on Oct 04, 2008, 11:37AM
| 2496 answers.

But... since you can't actually prove its correct, ignorant or educated, you can only believe it to be correct.

So... to say a theory is correct without proving it to be correct... is... incorrect...

*rubbing temples*

...owww...

Answered by arachnid on Oct 04, 2008, 01:11PM
| 1070 answers.

Right. I'm not claiming we can necessarially _know_ what the right answer is - just that there is one. And that "what you believe" is irrelevant when it comes to what really is the case. Telling someone that what they believe is all that counts is an invitation to stop seeking real answers.

Answered by nickj123 on Oct 05, 2008, 01:33PM

there was no big bang actually...so yea there was God Jesus and God and the Holy spirit. God v=created the world...you know why scientists cant figure out the big bang...because IT NEVER WAS!!!

Answered by arachnid on Oct 05, 2008, 01:38PM
| 1070 answers.

nickj123: Scientists "can't figure out the big bang"? The big bang is a scientific theory. In contrast, there's absolutely no evidence for what you're claiming.

Answered by simm on Oct 05, 2008, 08:26PM

Ok, most people talking about the big bang have no idea what they are talking about...there were no atoms, no protons, no neutrons, before or even right after the big bang. If people have questions, look them up in reliable sources.

And to people talking about 'proving' the big bang? Science is not about proving, because there is ALWAYS and element of uncertainty. Science is about giving examples and evidence that point to conclusions, and disproving false conclusions. And there is a lot of evidence that points towards the big bang theory.

Answered by simm on Oct 05, 2008, 08:32PM

Proof only exists in math.

Answer this Question: "I don't get this"

Your Answer: HTML is not allowed.


Back to top

Popular questions related to I don't get this